Quotidian. I
read that word in an essay I critiqued during my first semester in my MFA in writing program. I had to
look it up. Ironically, it’s a
fancy word for something that’s not, well, very fancy. Here’s how the New
Oxford American Dictionary defines it:
quotidian
|kwōˈtidēən|
adjective
[ attrib. ]
·
of or occurring every day; daily :
the car sped noisily off through the quotidian traffic.
·
ordinary or everyday, esp. when
mundane : his story is an achingly human one, mired in quotidian details.
While this word hasn’t become
a regular part of my vocabulary, its meaning resonates for me. Apparently it does for some other
writers as well. Patrick Madden wrote in praise of “Quotidian Nonfiction”
in Issue
#44, Spring 2012 - Creative Nonfiction:
“I prefer, in
both my writing and in my reading, meditative material that considers the
quotidian, that pauses and ponders, moving slowly, calmly—the kind of work that
would never incite a controversy, work that balances intellect and emotion,
with perhaps a bit of spirit.”
Madden, an essayist and writing teacher, claims to lean toward
quotidian nonfiction “because my own life so rarely excites even me; I could
never win over readers through shock or exoticism.”
I know the feeling. It
crops up for me often as I write personal essays and draft my memoir. My life
has been shaped by ordinary experiences of birth, loss, work, parenting,
friendship, and spiritual seeking. Experiences described by many of the
synonyms that the New Oxford lists
for quotidian: typical,
middle-of-the-road, unremarkable, unexceptional, workaday, commonplace, a dime
a dozen. In short, “nothing to
write home about.”
And yet I do write about these everyday
experiences. Am compelled to craft
essays about community, listening, patience, simplicity. Feel led to tell the stories of
“ordinary, everyday” people whose voices often aren’t heard. Patrick Madden attests to the value of
such writing:
“This, for me,
is the placid beauty of the best creative nonfiction writing: the opportunity
to settle one’s buzzing mind for a few brief moments, to meditate on a focused
subject, to escape the plangent assaults of the beeping, blinking world and
find respite in the thoughts of another human being… I think we have a right to
(and a hunger for) art that is quieter, more enlightening and uplifting.”
Fortunately, an abundance of nonfiction writers create the kind of
quiet and uplifting art that many of us yearn for. One of them, Ana
Maria Spagna, is my thesis advisor at NILA (Northwest Institute of Literary
Arts). Not only is she teaching me how to tell my story through well-crafted
scenes, settings, and characters, but also her own “quiet” writing enlightens
me.
Another is Scott Russell
Sanders who I’ll study with this summer at Fishtrap on the Zumwalt Prairie in northeastern
Oregon. I met Sanders at my first residency at NILA and have become a devoted
reader of his writing that springs, as he explains in Writing from the Center,
from accepting “the material that my life had given me, and… learning to say as
directly as I could what I had to say.”
Also on my list of quotidian writers is Kathleen Dean Moore, Brian Doyle, and
Brenda
Miller. All of them practice what Madden urges:
“ …each of us, I dare say, can do with a little more wonder in our
lives, can benefit by shunning the artificial and superficial to spend more time
contemplating the quotidian miracles that surround us.”
What quotidian miracles surround you?
Ah, that word is a gift! Like you, I had no idea that such a fancy word had such a simple meaning. Rather like wrapping a plain wooden board in glittery paper. My favorite quotidian miracle is probably a cliche: the spiderweb. But you can add to that: mitosis, green shoots pushing through dirt, and yeast.
ReplyDeleteYes, yeast! That earthy scent that transforms flour and water to chewy sustenance.
ReplyDelete